The IPAWS Modernization Act does more than make IPAWS law. It adds certain responsibilities. Some of the more noteworthy requirements of the Act include (with commentary in parenthesis):
- establishment of a committee of IPAWS stakeholders to expand collaboration and recommend improvements. (Long overdue. The list of members is comprehensive, although we wonder how this will be funded and operated.)
- conducting "public education efforts so that State, tribal, and local governments, private entities, and the people of the United States reasonably understand the functions of the public alert and warning system and how to access, use, and respond to information from the public alert and warning system through a general market awareness campaign". (IPAWS has conducted some outreach to certain stakeholders, but not to a large extent and none to the "general market" other than an occasional press release or mention on social media.)
- adding "the capability to alert, warn, and provide equivalent information to individuals with disabilities, individuals with access and functional needs, and individuals with limited-English proficiency, to the extent technically feasible." (IPAWS currently serves these populations to the extent EAS and WEA do. Presumably, the Modernization Act would require more effort in this regard.)
- ensuring IPAWS is "designed to adapt to, and incorporate, future technologies for communicating directly with the public." (We believe IPAWS is in good position to do this, although few people know how it will happen. Our recent blog post called "New Age of Alerting Coming: Ubiquitous Alerts" helps explain.)
- conducting training, tests, and exercises on a regular basis. This includes integration of training into the National Incident Management System (NIMS) on the use of the Emergency Alert System (EAS). (Broadcasters lobbied hard for this requirement, believing that EAS could be much more effective if more people received good training on it. They were right. EAS is the only IPAWS capability added to NIMS. It does not include WEA or the All Hazards Feed.)
- creation of a comprehensive annual performance report for public consumption. (This clearly adds more public accountability and perhaps even visibility, certainly a good thing.)