The nationwide tool paints a picture of the U.S. as a country woefully underprepared for damaging floods, both now and in the future.
The federal government's best efforts to predict where flooding will strike have underestimated the risk to nearly 6 million homes and commercial properties primarily located in the nation's interior, leaving them unprepared for potential devastation, the analysis shows.
In Summit County, the new model indicates there are 12,975 homes and other structures that fall into the substantial risk category, meaning they face a 1% annual risk of flooding. The current FEMA map places just 3,611 Summit properties in that risk level. In Akron alone, 3,482 additional properties are at risk currently, the study found, while Stow and Barberton have fewer than 900.
The analysis was conducted by the First Street Foundation, a nonprofit organization in Brooklyn, New York, that paired dozens of scientists and engineers with university researchers. The team combined several existing models of sea level rise, river flooding, and simulations of extreme weather events into a single, nationwide flood assessment model that examined risk in all states except Alaska and Hawaii.
While insurance and investment companies, such as Blackrock, have long used their own private models to make decisions, First Street reported its findings in a report released Monday.
The modeling performed by the group is "exactly what we need to be doing," said Kerry Emmanuel, a professor of atmospheric science at MIT who serves on First Street's advisory board.
"Until recently, we didn't have people putting all these little pieces together," he said. "We had really good people working on that little piece of the problem and good people working on another little corner."
First Street's model found about 14.6 million homes and other structures across the country currently face a 1% annual risk of flooding, representing about one out of every 10 real-estate parcels nationwide. But First Street calculated that current maps developed by FEMA place just 8.7 million properties in the floodplain, a 40% undercount compared to what First Street found.
And it's getting worse. In addition to a present-day analysis, First Street's modeling incorporated 2050 projections from the International Panel on Climate Change, the United Nations' primary scientific body on the issue. The conclusion: another 1.6 million properties will be at 1% annual risk of flooding by 2050.
During that time, flood risk would increase for an additional 26,671 properties in Ohio over First Street's 2020 prediction. Only 822 are in Summit County.
The 1% threshold is the gold standard the federal government uses to assess which homeowners are required to purchase flood insurance. But experts say it's also misleading, as it actually equates to a 1-in-4 chance of flooding over the course of a 30-year mortgage.
It's important that the FEMA map reflects an accurate risk assessment because local and county planners use it to determine which areas are safe to develop.
"We rely heavily on the FEMA floodplain map partly because that is tied to the national flood insurance program as well as mitigation dollars," said Franklin County Emergency Management Director Jeff Young.
The Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission uses the FEMA map when it makes long-term plans for things like new roads.
"We're looking out 30 years at what growth patterns, what employment and development we think will look like, and then what the necessary transportation improvements would be to support that," said Aaron Schill, director of data and mapping for MORPC.
Flooding is one issue they consider to understand how development and population will be distributed in the future.
"A change to that floodplain mapping, if it were adopted as an authoritative dataset ... that would really substantially impact how we model development in the future," Schill said.
For emergency managers, the FEMA map is just one tool in the toolbox, Young said. They also rely heavily on firsthand experience and the expertise of local leaders who know their jurisdictions the best.
"The floodplain map doesn't mean necessarily that if you're on one side of an imaginary line you're likely to flood and if you're a foot over the other side of the line you're safe from flooding," Young said. "It's always a matter of degrees."
Both agencies said they'd welcome more data from a new product like First Street's tool, but would be cautious.
"We're reluctant to take on newer, emerging things until they have been well tested and we know there is some rigor behind them," Schill said.
Discrepancy not surprising
Many flood experts said the discrepancy between the two models wasn't surprising, given the limitations baked into FEMA's calculations. The federal agency is stretched thin, struggling to keep its flood maps up to date, particularly for inland areas perceived to be less vulnerable than the coasts, experts said.The agency also only looks back at historical data to assess where flooding could strike next, leaving out current and future models that assess where else risk might exist or even be growing.
Historic data is becoming less reliable with emerging weather patterns brought on by the climate crisis, according to Aaron Wilson, a research scientist at Ohio State University's Byrd Polar and Climate Research Center. But models for predicting precipitation are also less reliable than scientists would like, Wilson said.
"We do anticipate the models are showing us more intense rainfall events," he said. "By 2050, we're looking at an average of three to five inches of rain more per year across the state of Ohio."
FEMA's maps and First Street's model depict different kinds of risk and serve different purposes, said FEMA press secretary Lizzie Litzow.
The agency sees First Street's Flood Factor as a tool to inform a property owner's decision to buy flood insurance or take steps to reduce individual flood risk, said Litzow.
FEMA's maps remain the backbone of effective floodplain management, said David Maurstad, the agency's Deputy Associate Administrator for Insurance and Mitigation.
Local adoption of minimum standards based on the maps helped avoid $100 billion in losses over the past 40 years, he said.
FEMA's regulatory maps depict the 1% chance annual event, but flood risks exist outside of that floodplain, Litzow said. By the agency's own accounting, 20% of flood claims come from properties outside of high-risk flood zones.
Although people try to compare flood maps to actual events, Litzow said the agency stated it's "not an apples-to-apples comparison."
'CARFAX for homes'
In addition to releasing a report with its findings, First Street has created a "Flood Factor" tool that the company promotes as a way for homeowners and buyers to evaluate any given property's risk for flooding. The tool also allows users to review whether the property flooded in the past, and receive wider statistics for their ZIP code, county and state.Some say that the application has perhaps the greatest implications for any use of First Street's model. While the tool likely will not immediately transform the real-estate market, experts predict that it will grow as Americans become more familiar with the tool and others like it.
"This sounds like a CARFAX for homes," said Larry Bartlett, the property appraiser for Volusia County, Florida, home of Daytona Beach.
While Bartlett figures some will doubt the data, just like they doubt sea level rise, others, especially mortgage lenders, would find the updated information invaluable.
"If I was a lender, I'd want to know if the property I was lending money on stood a good chance of being underwater in 30 years," Bartlett said. "If it gets to the point where people are relying on the data, it will definitely affect property values, but I don't think we're there yet."
It will help people see how climate change could affect them, said Ohio State's Wilson.
"Climate change is very personal. Because it impacts all of us now," he said. "We often see the melting ice. We see the ocean that's taking over island nations, and we think: 'Man, those places are far away. And they don't have anything to do with me.' "
A tool like First Street's allows someone to take data that's specific to the place they live, and make decisions with it, Wilson said.
"As a homeowner, am I protected? Am I in an area that's protected from frequent flooding in the future?" he said. "I think we all want that kind of data. I think people should take this data and be able to make decisions that build their own personal resilience to climate change."
But several experts urged caution, noting all models have limitations.
Chad Berginnis, executive director of the Association for State Floodplain Managers, warned that nationwide models by their very nature miss nuances at the local level.
"There is not going to be a national model that is the panacea to answer all flood risk questions," Berginnis said.
———
©2020 the Akron Beacon Journal (Akron, Ohio)
Visit the Akron Beacon Journal (Akron, Ohio) at www.ohio.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
