On Tuesday, police leaders from Orlando, Fla., to Dallas, Texas, gathered in the basement of Seattle police headquarters to discuss possible solutions, and to hear from technology experts.
Addressing the potentially sensitive images captured by police officers has been so present on the minds of law enforcement that the White House sponsored the “Police Data Initiative” earlier this year to investigate the issue.
Seattle police, who are part of the White House effort, are in the final weeks of a pilot project that placed body cameras on a handful of officers in the East Precinct. While department officials hope to have cameras on all patrol officers next year, they have yet to come up with a clear strategy on how to retain, store and release video sought through public disclosure.
The group gathered in Seattle Tuesday included police from Florida, Texas and Kentucky, as well as local media lawyers and Jennifer Pahlka, founder and executive director of Code for America, a nonpartisan organization for technology initiatives that has been likened to the Peace Corps or Teach for America. A representative from Taser — a major supplier of police video cameras and one of two companies being considered for the Seattle contract — was also there.
“We don’t claim to have all the answers, that’s for sure,” Seattle Police Chief Kathleen O’Toole said to the group.
Seattle Police Chief Operating Officer Mike Wagers said the department has a team dedicated to the video issue. The team includes Greg Russell, a former Amazon executive hired three months ago as the Seattle Police Department’s Chief Information Officer, and Tim Clemans, a self-taught programmer who made headlines last year when he inundated the department with public-disclosure requests. The department hired Clemans soon after he dropped all of his public-disclosure requests.
Clemans talked to the group on Tuesday about how the department currently blurs video released to the public, to protect people’s right to privacy, and how the department is focusing on installing a software program that will let it “auto-redact precisely.”
Russell said he wants to find easy-to-use software and technological devices to make officers’ jobs easier. He said he’s confident that at some point the department will be able to live-stream video from body cameras, all while redacting and keeping private, sensitive information out of public view.
One person missing from the technology forum was Ron Smith, who heads the Seattle Police Officer’s Guild. Smith said he supports cameras, but “any policy we come up with has to be a common-sense policy.”
“We have to account for privacy when Joe Q. Citizen calls the police and doesn’t want the camera in his house. We can’t have a confrontation with the public over the cameras. Nothing good comes of that,” Smith said. “There has got to be a mechanism for officers to turn off the cameras.”
Smith said that once Seattle’s pilot program ends, “the cameras go back onto the shelf” until the department negotiates a contract with the Police Officer’s Guild.
“This is a huge change in working conditions. It’s one more thing officers are accountable for,” Smith said.
During Tuesday’s forum, Dallas Police Department Assistant Chief Tom Lawrence peppered Wagers, Russell and others with questions.
Dallas police completed a pilot project outfitting 150 officers with body cameras earlier this year and are on track to get 1,000 cameras onto half the patrol division within the next three years. Lawrence, who attended a body-camera technology summit in Boston last week, said his department quickly needs to come up with an efficient and affordable way to release video to requesters.
“I’ve gone to several of these [meetings] in the last few months; everybody is struggling with open-records redaction,” Lawrence said. “We’re just trying to make sure we do what’s right.”
©2015 The Seattle Times, Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
